How is my different approach can be more valuable to you…
Team Dynamics & Communication
Difference: Instead of feeling highly productive by solving many visible but unimportant problems, reveal and solve the important but hidden ones.
Effect: Solve the important problems.
Requirements Engineering
Difference: Instead of trying to find out your process by implementing it in code, you can gain faster much more understanding if you do it visually; as I do it type-driven, we get the function type definitions almost for free.
Effect: Significantly less implementation risk by decoupling requirement engineering and implementation.
System Design
Difference: Instead of putting effort into sth. that does not really increase system throughput, increase the system's througput by working on the factor with highest leverage by using TOC.
Effect: Putting only effort in increasing throughput what actually can increase throughput and/or decrease flow-time.
Software Engineering
Critical Path:
Difference: Instead of mixing integration with component problem solving tasks, solve them separate to limit complexity.
Effect: Get significantly faster to higher quality solutions.
Function Architecture:
Difference: Instead of wiring functions without or with unclear interfaces, use events as interfaces between functions.
Effect: The most important events in the process are actually made visible! Greater clarity and mapping to the business process
Implement Function:
Difference: Instead of letting the function realise the distinguishables, let it only map already realised distinguishables to actions.
Effect: Clearer & more understandable abstractions, higher code re-use & easier refactoring as distinguishables are centralised, less maintenance cost as function is minimal.